- Open Access
Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) for differentiation between Thai and Myanmar strains of Wuchereria bancrofti
© Nuchprayoon et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
- Received: 25 May 2006
- Accepted: 30 July 2007
- Published: 30 July 2007
Lymphatic filariasis (LF) is a mosquito-borne disease caused by mosquito-transmitted filarial nematodes, including Wuchereria bancrofti and Brugia malayi. The Lymphatic Filariasis Elimination Program in Thailand has reduced the prevalence of nocturnally subperiodic W. bancrofti (Thai strain), mainly transmitted by the Ochlerotatus (Aedes) niveus group in Thailand to 0.57/100,000 population. However, it is estimated that more than one million Myanmar migrants with high prevalence of bancroftian filariasis have settled in the large urban cities of Thailand. These infected migrants carry the nocturnally periodic W. bancrofti (Myanmar strain) which has Culex quinquefasciatus as the main mosquito vector. Although transmissions of the Myanmar strain of W. bancrofti by the Thai Cx. quinquefasciatus has never been reported, previous study showed that Cx. quinquefasciatus could nurture the Myanmar strain of W. bancrofti to the infective stage. Thus, the potential now exists for a re-emergence of bancroftian filariasis in Thailand. The present study was undertaken in an attempt to differentiate between the Thai and Myanmar strains of W. bancrofti.
The microfilarial periodicity of Thai and the Myanmar strains of W. bancrofti were determined. Comparative morphology and morphometry of microfilariae and a study of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) was performed. The Nei's genetic distance was calculated, and a phylogenetic tree was constructed using the Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic mean (UPGMA).
The Thai strain of W. bancrofti was nocturnally subperiodic, and the Myanmar strain of W. bancrofti was nocturnally periodic. The body length, cephalic space length, and cephalic space width of the Thai strain of W. bancrofti were significantly larger than those of the Myanmar strain of W. bancrofti (p < 0.05). However, an overlapping mean of these parameters made it impractical for field application. RAPD-PCR profiles showed specific bands characteristic for the Myanmar strain of W. bancrofti. The phylogenetic tree indicated two genetically distinct clusters of the Thai and Myanmar strains of W. bancrofti.
This study was the first report on the genetic polymorphism of the Thai and Myanmar strains of W. bancrofti. Differentiation between the Thai and Myanmar strains of W. bancrofti could not rely on morphological criteria alone. However, RAPD profiles revealed a significant diversity between the two strains. The RAPD-PCR technique was suitable for differentiating Thai and Myanmar strains of W. bancrofti. The RAPD marker could be used for epidemiological assessment of the Myanmar strains of W. bancrofti in Thailand.
- Lymphatic Filariasis
- Unweighted Pair Group Method With Arithmetic
- Nerve Ring
- Thai Patient
- Bancroftian Filariasis
Lymphatic filariasis (LF), the second leading cause of long-term disability worldwide from lymphedema, elephantiasis, hydrocele and periodic fevers, is caused by mosquito-transmitted filarial parasites, Wuchereria bancrofti and Brugia malayi . It is estimated that 1.1 billion people, 20% of the world's population, in more than 83 countries are at risk of acquiring the infection, while more than 120 million individuals have already been infected . In 1993, the International Task Force for Disease Eradication (ITFDE) identified LF as one of six potentially eradicable infectious diseases. In 1997, the World Health Assembly passed a resolution to eliminate of LF as a public health problem by 2020 .
In Thailand, bancroftian filariasis is endemic on the Thai-Myanmar border (mainly Tak, Kanchanaburi, and Mae Hongson Provinces) [4–6]. The nocturnally subperiodic W. bancrofti (rural strain; Thai strain) found in infected Thai rural populations has the Ochlerotatus (Aedes) niveus group as the main mosquito vector. Recently, it has been reported that Myanmar migrant workers in Thailand carry W. bancrofti at a prevalence of 2–8% . These infected Myanmar migrants carry the nocturnally periodic W. bancrofti (urban strain; Myanmar strain) which has Culex quinquefasciatus as the main mosquito vector . Cx. quinquefasciatus readily breeds in urban areas of Thailand. The Thai strain of Cx. quinquefasciatus could nurture the Myanmar strain of W. bancrofti to the infective stage in a recent laboratory study . This means that the urban Thai population is at risk of the infection. The high prevalence of W. bancrofti infection in Myanmar migrant workers has prompted concern that a re-emergence of bancroftian filariasis in Thailand is impending.
The Myanmar strain of W. bancrofti has been proven to be distinct from the Thai strain of W. bancrofti based on microfilarial periodicity, its dimensions and the number of nuclei between the cephalic space and nerve ring [8, 9]. However, a morphological and morphometric study is time-consuming, laborious, and consequently not suitable for large-scale application. DNA polymorphism assay, based on random the amplified polymorphic DNA polymerase chain reaction (RAPD-PCR), has been proved useful for analyzing the inter- and intra-specific genetic variations and phylogenetic relationships. The RAPD technique is based on the amplification of a random DNA segment with a single primer of arbitrary nucleotide sequence and using the polymerase chain reaction [10, 11]. This technique is very rapid, simple, and generates a reproducible fingerprint of the PCR products. In addition, it neither depends on previous knowledge or availability of the target DNA sequences nor requires DNA hybridization. The potential use of RAPD in taxonomy and population genetics has been widely documented [12–15], including with W. bancrofti populations in India [16, 17]. However, no information is available concerning the genetic polymorphism between the Thai and Myanmar strains of W. bancrofti. We developed the RAPD-PCR technique to differentiate between the Thai and Myanmar strains of W. bancrofti.
This study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University (Bangkok, Thailand). As almost none of the Myanmar workers spoke or read either Thai or English, verbal informed consent in the Myanmar language was obtained from each volunteer in the presence of two witnesses. We had a Thai-Myanmar interpreter for communicating with the Myanmar migrants. After the study was completed, all volunteers received a standard course of treatment with diethylcarbamacine.
The periodicity of each strain of W. bancrofti microfilariae was determined by counting the microfilariae from 20 μl finger-prick blood films, in triplicates, taken at 2-hour intervals over a period of 24 hours. We obtained microfilariae from 4 Thai and 4 Myanmar infected cases. Each blood film was stained with Giemsa (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), as previously described [6, 18, 19]. The blood film was examined under a light microscope by two independent individuals. The average counts of microfilariae were plotted against time.
Blood for morphological and morphometric studies and RAPD was obtained from each infected individual. Ten milliliters of venous blood were collected under sterile technique and universal precautions from Thai patients at 20.00 hours, and from Myanmar patients at 02.00 hours, as previously described [18, 19].
Morphological and morphometric study
The standard smear method  was used to prepare the slides. Twenty microliters of blood were smeared in a straight line on a clean slide, dried, dehemoglobinized, and stained with Giemsa. The stained microfilariae were assessed by counting the number of nuclei between cephalic space and nerve ring using a light microscope. The body length and width at various sites were measured using an ocular micrometer, the camera-lucida, and curve meter, determined by two independent individuals. Thirty microfilariae from each patient were studied. Differences in means were analyzed by standard t-test using SPSS software program.
One milliliter of blood was mixed with 9 ml of isotonic phosphate buffered saline (PBS [pH 7.4]; 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 8 mM Na2HPO4, and 1.5 mM KH2PO4), filtered through a 5.0 μM Millipore membrane filter (Millipore, Billerica, MA), followed by adding approximately 20 ml of PBS, and air drying . After the filters were transferred to the plate containing PBS, microfilariae were harvested using a needle under a stereo microscope, and suspended in 10 μl of PBS.
DNA extraction was performed using FTA paper (Whatman Bioscience, Cambridge, UK) as previously described . Briefly, the microfilariae were washed twice with PBS, and then subjected to 3 freeze-thaw cycles, and blotted onto the FTA paper. After air drying, the FTA paper was washed twice with 200 μl of FTA purification buffer (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD) for 15 min, washed twice with 200 μl of TE-1 buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 0.1 mM EDTA [pH 8.0]) for 5 min, and then dried on a heating block at 56°C for 10 min. The dried FTA paper was used as the DNA template in RAPD-PCR amplification.
Six oligonucleotides from the ready-to-go RAPD analysis kit (Amersham Biosciences Ltd., Piscataway, NJ) were used for amplification of random DNA markers to reveal the genetic diversity among W. bancrofti populations. RAPD-PCR was performed with ready-to-go RAPD analysis Beads as described by the manufacturer (Amersham Biosciences). Approximately 10 ng of genomic DNA from microfilriae was used. The RAPD reaction was performed in a DNA thermal cycler (GeneAmp PCR System 2400, Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, CT), for 1 cycle at 96°C for 4 min, followed by 40 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 40°C for 1 min and 72°C for 2 min, respectively. The final amplification cycle included 7 min extension at 72°C. Amplified products were analyzed by 2% agarose gel (USB, Cleveland, OH) electrophoresis, stained with ethidium bromide, and visualized under ultraviolet light. The size of each band was determined by Quantity One® 1-D Analysis Software (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). RAPD analysis of human DNA (control), using the same primer and protocol was also conducted to rule out the possibility of contamination of human DNA in the samples. The amplification of all the DNA samples was repeated three times in order to see the variability, if any, in the amplification patterns. Similar patterns were obtained from all experiments.
Phylogenetic analysis of the RAPD profiles
RAPD profiles were used to measure genetic similarity among W. bancrofti populations. The presence or absence of bands was coded in binary (0, 1) form in a data matrix. Parasites from one individual patient were treated as a genetic population. Relationships among the individual genetic populations of W. bancrofti were determined by a distance matrix method. The approach involved calculation of the Nei (1973) index of genetic similarity . Distance values were subjected to phylogenetic analyses using the Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic mean (UPGMA) as implemented in the UPGMA program of the PAUP software package, version 4.0b10 .
The microfilariae were present in peripheral blood of 4 Myanmar patients during 18.00 hours and 10.00 hours, and absent during 12.00 hours and 16.00 hours, indicating the nocturnal periodicity character of the Myanmar strains of W. bancrofti. The peak count of the Myanmar strain of W. bancrofti microfilariae in peripheral blood was at 02.00 hours.
Microfilarial morphology and morphometry
Microfilariae of both the Thai and Myanmar strains of W. bancrofti were sheathed, lying in graceful coils without secondary kinking. Somatic nuclei were discrete, overlapping where crowded but with distinct borders, and countable. The nuclear column stopped before the tip of the tail.
Morphometric measurements and nuclei counts between the cephalic space and nerve ring of the Thai and Myanmar strains of Wuchereria bancrofti microfilariae
Thai (nocturnally subperiodic)
Myanmar (nocturnally periodic)
299.20 ± 11.87 (270–324)
286.92 ± 9.42 (255–310)
Cephalic space length
5.47 ± 0.68 (4–7)
5.20 ± 0.71 (4–7)
Head to nerve ring length
56.81 ± 5.33 (34–72)
56.24 ± 3.26 (48–67)
42.62 ± 5.79 (32–64)
42.67 ± 5.09 (32–60)
Cephalic space width
5.91 ± 0.53 (4–8)
5.62 ± 0.57 (4–7)
Body width at nerve ring
6.32 ± 0.52 (6–8)
6.30 ± 0.69 (5–9)
Number of nuclei between cephalic space and nerve ring
89.52 ± 6.37 (72–103)
88.51 ± 8.29 (66–101)
The microfilarial periodicity of the Thai strain of W. bancrofti was nocturnally subperiodic, with a peak microfilaremia at 20.00 hours (Figure 2). The microfilarial periodicity of the Myanmar strain of W. bancrofti was nocturnally periodic, with a peak microfilaremia at 02.00 hours. The microfilarial periodicity found in our study corresponded to previous reports [8, 9].
We found that only 3 morphometric measurement parameters, body length, cephalic space length, and cephalic space width, of the Thai strain were significantly larger than those of the Myanmar strain of W. bancrofti (Table 1), while previous studies [8, 9] showed that all parameters measured in the Thai strain of W. bancrofti were larger than in the Myanmar strain of W. bancrofti. This might be the result of a difference of geographic locations of the study populations. The Thai strain of W. bancrofti in our study was obtained from Tha Song Yang District, Tak Province, and Sankhla Buri District, Kanchanaburi Province, while the Thai strain of W. bancrofti in previous studies was obtained from Mae-Ramat District, Tak province. However, the previous studies do not provide the information where the Myanmar strain of W. bancrofti was obtained. Further studies would clarify this issue. Although the body length, cephalic space length, and cephalic space width were significantly different between the Thai and Myanmar strains of W. bancrofti, the ranges of these parameters were overlapping (body length, 270–324 μm versus 255–310 μm; cephalic space length, 4.00–7.00 μm versus 4.00–7.00 μm; and cephalic space width, 4.00–8.00 μm versus 4.00–7.00 μm, from the Thai strain and the Myanmar strains of W. bancrofti, respectively). The overlapping range of values made it impractical to differentiate between the Thai and Myanmar strains of W. bancrofti. In addition, the morphological and morphometric studies were time-consuming, laborious, and consequently not suitable for large-scale application [8, 9]. This difference can only be distinguished by highly experienced personnel [8, 9].
Differentiation of filarial nematodes have been reported, using DNA hybridization assays [24–27], PCR [18, 28–30], PCR-RFLP [6, 31–34], and RAPD [12–17]. However, there is no report of any molecular technique that could differentiate between the Thai and Myanmar strains of W. bancrofti. Our RAPD profiles of the Thai and Myanmar strains of W. bancrofti revealed a significant diversity (Figure 3), with 300 bp and 795 bp bands specific for the Myanmar strain of W. bancrofti. The phylogenetic analysis exhibited two distinct clusters of the Thai and Myanmar strains of W. bancrofti (Figure 4). Therefore RAPD-PCR was suitable to differentiate between the Thai and Myanmar strains of W. bancrofti. The RAPD-PCR has been proven to be an easy, reproducible and rapid technique that could be used as a diagnostic tool to assess the real burden of Thai and Myanmar strains of W. bancrofti in Thailand. Further study of the Myanmar strain of W. bancrofti-specific bands by Sequence Characterized Amplified Region (SCAR) [35, 36] should be performed to develop strain-specific PCR primers/probes, to identify the Myanmar strain of W. bancrofti.
Although the existence of different strains of W. bancrofti (based on microfilarial periodicity) was documented in the past , differentiation techniques using laboratory methods (eg. morphological and morphometric study) have been a problem. We could differentiate between the Thai and Myanmar strains of W. bancrofti by comparing morphology and morphometry using microscopy, biological behavior by microfilarial periodicity, and genetics by RAPD technique. However, the PCR-based technique for RAPD could clearly characterize genetic differences between the Thai and Myanmar strains of W. bancrofti. The RAPD-PCR technique was indeed useful for the differentiation of strains of W. bancrofti because of its relative ease, simplicity and reproducibility.
This study was financially supported by the National Research Council of Thailand. AJ is supported by The Royal Golden Jubilee Ph.D. Program. YP is a Senior Research Scholar of the Thailand Research Funds. We would like to thank Dr. Saravudh Suvannadabba, Dr Anupong Chitvarakorn, and officers of the Filariasis Division and regional officers for their support in specimen collection. We appreciate Assoc. Prof. Suwannee Nithiuthai, Assist. Prof. Dr. Nareerat Viseshakul and Ms. Sudchit Chungpivat for their kind advice, and the staff of the Parasitology Unit, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary, and the staff of the Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, for their technical help. We also appreciate Ms. Vivornpun Sanprasert, Ms. Pornpun Jarussing, and Ms. Suttida Promruk, for their technical help and specimen collection. We are thankful to Dr. Jessada Denduangboripant for his help with the phylogenetic analyses using PAUP software. Lastly, we would like to thank Research Affairs, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, and Venerable Dr. Mettanando Bhikkhu of the Foundation of King Rama IX, The Great, for editing the manuscript.
- Anonymous: Reducing Risks and Promoting Healthy Life. World Health Report. WHO. 2002, [http://www.who.int/whr/2002/en/]Google Scholar
- Molyneux DH, Bradley M, Hoerauf A, Kyelem D, Taylor MJ: Mass drug treatment for lymphatic filariasis and onchocerciasis. Trends Parasitol. 2003, 19: 516-522. 10.1016/j.pt.2003.09.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Behbehani K: Candidate parasitic diseases. Bull World Health Organ. 1998, 64-67. 76 (Suppl 2)Google Scholar
- Triteeraprapab S, Nuchprayoon I, Porksakorn C, Poovorawan Y, Scott AL: High prevalence of Wuchereria bancrofti infection among Myanmar migrants in Thailand. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2001, 95: 535-538. 10.1080/00034980120072248.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Triteeraprapab S, Kanjanopas K, Suwannadabba S, Sangprakarn S, Poovorawan Y, Scott AL: Transmission of the nocturnal periodic strain of Wuchereria bancrofti by Culex quinquefasciatus: establishing the potential for urban filariasis in Thailand. Epidemiol Infect. 2000, 125: 207-212. 10.1017/S0950268899004355.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nuchprayoon S, Sangprakarn S, Junpee A, Nithiuthai S, Chungpivat S, Poovorawan Y: Differentiation of Brugia malayi and Brugia pahangi by PCR-RFLP of ITS-1 and ITS-2. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2003, 34: 67-73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sucharit S, Harinasuta C: The hypothesis on the evolution of Wuchereria bancrofti. J Med Assoc Thai. 1981, 64: 367-373.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sumethvanich S, Choochote W, Panart K, Jitpakdi A, Panart P: Comparative morphometry of noctunally periodic and subperiodic Wuchereria bancrofti microfilaria. J Trop Med Parasitol. 1996, 19: 55-56.Google Scholar
- Jitpakdi A, Choochote W, Panart P, Insun P, Panart K, Pitasawat B, Prajakwong S: Variation in microfilariae and infective stages of two types of Wuchereria bancrofti from the Thai-Myanmar border. J Helminthol. 1999, 73: 317-321.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Welsh J, McClelland M: Fingerprinting genomes using PCR with arbitrary primers. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990, 18: 7213-7218. 10.1093/nar/18.24.7213.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Williams JG, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, Rafalski JA, Tingey SV: DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990, 18: 6531-6535. 10.1093/nar/18.22.6531.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morgan UM, Constantine CC, Greene WK, Thompson RC: RAPD (random amplified polymorphic DNA) analysis of Giardia DNA and correlation with isoenzyme data. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1993, 87: 702-705. 10.1016/0035-9203(93)90303-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bandi C, La Rosa G, Comincini S, Damiani G, Pozio E: Random amplified polymorphic DNA technique for the identification of Trichinella species. Parasitology. 1993, 107: 419-424.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shiff C, Brouwer KC, Clow L: Schistosoma haematobium: population genetics of S. haematobium by direct measurement of parasite diversity using RAPD-PCR. Exp Parasitol. 2000, 96: 47-51. 10.1006/expr.2000.4548.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sire C, Langand J, Barral V, Theron A: Parasite (Schistosoma mansoni) and host (Biomphalaria glabrata) genetic diversity: population structure in a fragmented landscape. Parasitology. 2001, 122: 545-554. 10.1017/S0031182001007727.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pradeep Kumar N, Patra KP, Hoti SL, Das PK: Genetic variability of the human filarial parasite, Wuchereria bancrofti in South India. Acta Trop. 2002, 82: 67-76. 10.1016/S0001-706X(02)00037-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thangadurai R, Hoti SL, Kumar NP, Das PK: Phylogeography of human lymphatic filarial parasite, Wuchereria bancrofti in India. Acta Trop. 2006, 98: 297-304. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2006.06.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nuchprayoon S, Yentakam S, Sangprakarn S, Junpee A: Endemic bancroftian filariasis in Thailand: detection by Og4C3 antigen capture ELISA and the polymerase chain reaction. J Med Assoc Thai. 2001, 84: 1300-1307.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nuchprayoon S, Porksakorn C, Junpee A, Sanprasert V, Poovorawan Y: Comparative assessment of an Og4C3 ELISA and an ICT filariasis test: a study of Myanmar migrants in Thailand. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2003, 21: 253-257.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sasa M: Human filariasis. 1976, A Global survey of epidemiology and control: University of Tokyo PressGoogle Scholar
- Jaijakul S, Saksirisampant W, Prownebon J, Yenthakam S, Mungthin M, Leelayoova S, Nuchprayoon S: Pneumocystis jiroveci in HIV/AIDS patients: detection by FTA filter paper together with PCR in noninvasive induced sputum specimens. J Med Assoc Thai. 2005, 88 (Suppl 4): S294-S299.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nei M: Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 1973, 70: 3321-3323.Google Scholar
- Swofford DL: PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4. 2002, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USAGoogle Scholar
- McReynolds LA, DeSimone SM, Williams SA: Cloning and comparison of repeated DNA sequences from the human filarial parasite Brugia malayi and the animal parasite Brugia pahangi. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 1986, 83 (3): 797-801.Google Scholar
- Williams SA, DeSimone SM, McReynolds LA: Species-specific oligonucleotide probes for the identification of human filarial parasites. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1988, 28: 163-169. 10.1016/0166-6851(88)90064-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Poole CB, Williams SA: A rapid DNA assay for the species-specific detection and quantification of Brugia in blood samples. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1990, 40: 129-136. 10.1016/0166-6851(90)90086-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Siridewa K, Karunanayake EH, Chandrasekharan NV, Abeyewickreme W, Franzen L, Aslund L, Pettersson U: Cloning and characterization of a repetitive DNA sequence specific for Wuchereria bancrofti. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1994, 51: 495-500.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lizotte MR, Supali T, Partono F, Williams SA: A polymerase chain reaction assay for the detection of Brugia malayi in blood. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1994, 51: 314-321.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Williams SA, Nicolas L, Lizotte-Waniewski M, Plichart C, Luquiaud P, Nguyen LN, Moulia-Pelat JP: A polymerase chain reaction assay for the detection of Wuchereria bancrofti in blood samples from French Polynesia. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1996, 90: 384-387. 10.1016/S0035-9203(96)90515-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Triteeraprapab S, Karnjanopas K, Porksakorn C, Sai-Ngam A, Yentakam S, Loymak S: Lymphatic filariasis caused by Brugia malayi in an endemic area of Narathiwat Province, southern of Thailand. J Med Assoc Thai. 2001, 84 (Suppl 1): 182-188.Google Scholar
- Thanomsub BW, Chansiri K, Sarataphan N, Phantana S: Differential diagnosis of human lymphatic filariasis using PCR-RFLP. Mol Cell Probes. 2000, 14: 41-46. 10.1006/mcpr.1999.0283.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chansiri K, Tejangkura T, Kwaosak P, Sarataphan N, Phantana S, Sukhumsirichart W: PCR based method for identification of zoonostic Brugia malayi microfilariae in domestic cats. Mol Cell Probes. 2002, 16: 129-135. 10.1006/mcpr.2001.0402.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nuchprayoon S, Junpee A, Nithiuthai S, Chungpivat S, Suvannadabba S, Poovorawan Y: Detection of filarial parasites in domestic cats by PCR-RFLP of ITS1. Vet Parasitol. 2006, 140: 366-372. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.04.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nuchprayoon S, Junpee A, Poovorawan Y, Scott AL: Detection and differentiation of filarial parasites by universal primers and polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005, 73: 895-900.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Garcia GM, Stalker HT, Shroeder E, Kochert G: Identification of RAPD, SCAR, and RFLP markers tightly linked to nematode resistance genes introgressed from Arachis cardenasii into Arachis hypogaea. Genome. 1996, 39: 836-845.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Manguin S, Kengne P, Sonnier L, Harbach RE, Baimai V, Trung HD, Coosemans M: SCAR markers and multiplex PCR-based identification of isomorphic species in the Anopheles dirus complex in Southeast Asia. Med Vet Entomol. 2002, 16: 46-54. 10.1046/j.0269-283x.2002.00344.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.