Overview: Report of a Scientific Working Group on Serious Adverse Events following Mectizan® treatment of onchocerciasis in Loa loa endemic areas.

This report reviews information on Serious Adverse Events (SAE), mainly Loa-encephalopathy, following treatment with ivermectin (Mectizan®, Merck, Sharpe & Dohme) for control of onchocerciasis carried out by the African Programme for Onchocerciasis Control (APOC), in areas where heavy microfilarial infections with Loa loa are co-endemic with Onchocerca volvulus infections. It also endeavours to define the information and research needed to understand, prevent, and manage cases of Loa-encephalopathy.

In coping with the recent appearance of the risk of Loaencephalopathy, the Mectizan ® Expert Committee and its secretariat, the Mectizan ® Donation Program (MDP), and the national onchocerciasis control programmes, involving APOC and associated Non-Governmental Development Organizations (NGDOs), have to assess the benefits of mass treatment in preventing the blindness and unpleasant skin manifestations of onchocerciasis in large numbers of infected persons, against the risk of inciting severe and sometimes fatal reactions of Loa-encephalopathy in a small proportion of treated persons living in areas of high Loa co-endemicity. In practical terms, this dilemma raises a number of problems and implies the need for much extra effort and costs in the field prior to, during, and shortly after community distribution of Mectizan ® .
As Haselow et al., [1] point out, the risk of Loa-encephalopathy demands better explanation of the benefit/risk ratio in those communities to be treated by APOC wherein L. loa and O. volvulus are co-endemic, and also more careful control of stocks of Mectizan ® . It demands a reinforced health-education campaign in favour of taking Mectizan ® . It will mean confining Mectizan ® treatment more rigidly to hyper-and meso-endemic onchocerciasis communities, which in turn implies more accurate Rapid Epidemiological Assessment (REA) to exclude hypoendemic onchocerciasis communities. Where treatment is to go ahead, the population must be made aware, without inciting undue alarm, of the early signs of Loa-encephalopathy so as to facilitate rapid referral of such cases to hospital; and each potential referral hospital needs to have a team of at least four persons who are trained to deal with Loa-encephalopathy cases. In terms of practical field assessment, the models explored by Addiss et al., [2] suggest that accurate REA identification of hyper-and mesoendemic onchocerciasis communities, coupled with a RAPLOA limit of 20% of persons with a history of Loa worms crossing the eyeball, is probably the currently best safety limit to apply.
Collections of data from past reports submitted to the MDP have been carefully analysed by Twum-Danso [3,4] who indicates that, among all 207 SAEs recorded by passive surveillance during 165,000,000 Mectizan ® treatments (1:800,000) carried out between 1989 and 2001, there were 65 (31·4%) cases of "probable" or "possible" Loa-encephalopathy temporally related to Mectizan ® treatment. Of them: i) 85 % were in males; ii) 93% followed the first dose of ivermectin; iii) 97% were from Cameroon; iv) The mean age of the subjects was 39·9 years ( The clinical manifestations of Loa-encephalopathy are well described by Boussinesq et al. [5]. Hospital staff in areas at risk of Loa-encephalopathy need to be familiar especially with: i) the neurological symptoms and signs, and haemorrhages of the palpebral conjunctiva (HPCs) and their time of onset; ii) the vital importance of good-nursing of cases to prevent bed-sores and of re-hydration; iii) the likely duration of the various stages of the disease; and iv) the probable diagnostic concentrations of Loa mfs to be found in such cases at various intervals post-treatment.
All the above considerations will inevitably add considerable costs and effort to the activities of the MDP and APOC in the co-endemic Loa areas concerned.
To date, cases of sometimes fatal ivermectin-induced Loaencephalopathy show a very remarkable distributional clumping in one particular Health Area (Lékié) in the Republic of Cameroon; but it should be remembered that similar Loa-encephalopathies have been reported following treatment of individual loiasis sufferers with diethylcarbamazine citrate (DEC), which is both a potent microfilaricide and a fairly effective macrofilaricide for L. loa. Again there was evidence of distributional clumping, this time in the Mayumbe Region of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), where 80-90 cases were recorded over 10 years in a single hospital [6]. This appears to be another potentially dangerous area that is only now about to be covered by the activities of APOC, and one that may well give rise to difficulties. This remarkable clumping of cases may eventually provide a clue to the causation of Loa-encephalopathy. On the other hand, more mundane aspects involving the different Health Areas, particularly in Cameroon, need also to be taken into account. The authorities in Health Areas that provide free hospital treatment for sufferers (e.g. Lékié) are likely to be made aware of many more cases of Loa-encephalopathy than those in which patients are expected to pay for their treatment and may thus prefer to remain hidden in their homes.
The Report emphasizes the importance of an experimental approach to determine (i) the factors governing the remarkably uneven distribution of cases within the Loa-endemic area; (ii) the practical means of detecting communities that are at high risk of Loa-encephalopathy; (iii) the clinical symptoms and signs that characterise Loaencephalopathy and the recommendations for its clinical management; (iv) the means of allaying the fears of the inhabitants that they may suffer from Loa-encephalopathy; and (v) the responsibilities of the Ministries of Health, APOC, the national/APOC/NGDO Mectizan ® distribution teams and of individual physicians and supporting hospital staff in dealing with them.
The exact pathogenesis of Loa-encephalopathy is not presently understood, but the most probable primary factor involved is the high concentration of Loa microfilariae in the blood-stream. This problem could well be investigated in experimentally-infected monkeys, especially Mandrillus leucophaeus [7] and M. sphinx, both of which are good natural hosts of the nocturnally-periodic simian Loa and can also readily be infected with the diurnally-periodic, Filaria Journal 2003, 2 http://filariajournal.com/content/2/S1/S1 human L. loa. In the simian host, the spleen becomes enlarged and granulomatous as it accomplishes its function of destroying a large proportion of the circulating Loa microfilariae [8,9]. When the spleen is removed surgically, very high concentrations of microfilariae will develop in the peripheral blood (of the same order -up to 50,000/ ml -as those seen pre-treatment in human Loa-encephalopathy patients), providing what is probably an excellent model for studying drug-induced Loa-encephalopathy. Furthermore, the diurnally-periodic human and the nocturnally-periodic simian parasites can be hybridised in the simian host [10].
Although the main Chrysops vectors of the human and simian parasites are different (day-biting at ground-level and attracted by wood-smoke, for Chrysops silacea and C. dimidiata, the main vectors of the human parasite; and night-biting at forest canopy-level for C. langi and C. centurionis, vectors of the simian parasite) [11], this raises the possibility that under forest-dwelling conditions humans may, over the course of time, become infected with simian or hybrid strains of Loa having larger microfilariae and possibly also different periodicities or other characteristics. It is noteworthy that some of the patients with Loaencephalopathy following DEC treatment in the Mayumbe area of the DRC showed abnormal periodicities, some of which were predominantly nocturnal. It is also interesting that the Sanaga River, which flows through Cameroon, is a well-known faunal barrier that separates M. leucophaeus on the north-west bank from M. sphinx on the south-east bank. It is thus possible that different strains of human and simian Loa may exist and may have spread to, or hybridised in, the human population in different areas.
Not only may studies of Loa in monkeys (recently re-initiated in Cameroon by Drs. S. Wanji and P. Enyong) reveal the possible influence of strains or sub-species of Loa on the development of Loa-encephalopathy, but they should facilitate investigations into the biochemical, haematological and histopathological changes that occur in this condition, thus elucidating the mechanism, pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of Loa-encephalopathy in splenectomised monkeys with very high Loa mfs counts.
In the Report, careful consideration is also given by Edwards et al., [12] and Mackenzie et al., [13] to the possible effects of a putative gene mutation in humans (analogous to that found in collie dogs and collie cross-breeds) which renders its carriers fatally susceptible to the effects of ivermectin. An absence or functional deficiency in Pglycoprotein production (or its inhibition by alcohol or some other food-stuff) in the apical membrane of the brain capillary epithelial cells could result in dangerous penetration of ivermectin into the brain. Informed current opinion is that this putative alternative pathogenesis of Loa-encephalopathy is less plausible than the mfsembolic hypothesis, but that the existence of any such putative gene deficiency in humans could be determined by experiment.
Another possible mechanism for Loa-encephalopathy is the release of Wolbachia organisms from dying adult worms but, as these endosymbionts are seldom found in Loa [14,15], this hypothesis is now considered somewhat unlikely.
Finally, the report suggests that the prevention of Loaencephalopathy in humans could also be investigated directly as, for example, by studying the potentialities of using lower doses of ivermectin or by pre-treatment with albendazole designed to lower the basic concentrations of Loa microfilariae at a slower rate.
Publish with Bio Med Central and every scientist can read your work free of charge http://filariajournal.com/content/2/S1/S1